|
Proposition 188 was the industry attempt to counter the growing number of local clean air ordinances throughout
California. Promoted by the industry as a tobacco control law, Prop 188 was an alternative to the smoke-free workplace bill, AB 13,
that would ensure uniform statewide regulation of smoking in public places. This proposition would have effectively preempted
existing local laws and restrictions. Proposition 188 was defeated in 1994 by a 71% "No" vote.
The documents below provide an overview of the tobacco industry's campaign planning and motivation for Prop 188 as well as strategies to
accomodate smokers within the constraints of AB 13 when it passed into law in 1995.
|
| |
|
|
| |
San Fran and CA (1993)
A series of e-mail exchanges regarding California's clean indoor air programs,
ordinances AB13 and AB996, and the possible venues for counter attacks by the industry
within the legislative, initiative, regulatory, and legal arenas.
The author states, "the economic arguments which only a year ago prevented the ban in Los Angeles and San Francisco are losing the ability to persuade as more and more communities, small and large, have banned smoking without apparent economic effect."
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ccd65e00 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Prop 188 SWOT Analysis (1994)
This is an analysis of the political situation surrounding Prop 188 shortly before the election, outlining the strengths
and weaknesses of the different positions. The Wellness Foundation campaign and the influence of C. Everett Koop is of major concern.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/oer85f00 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
California Action Plan (1994)
Includes a proposal by the political consulting agency, the Dolphin Group, Inc., to head three distinct programs for Philip Morris:
the Restaurant Accomodation Program which would educate California's hospitality industry in ways to accomodate smokers within
the boundaries of AB-13; creation of a state-wide California Tavern Association which would safeguard bars and taverns
against the threat of a total smoking ban; and the Point of Sale Protection program.
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xeq55e00 |
|
| |